Rubric
Evaluation
5 Points: Fully met and also exceeded criteria
4 Points: Completed and met requirements, but did surpass criteria
3 Points: Incomplete one or more ways not meeting criteria fully
2 Points: Attempted. Criteria is misunderstood and/or avoided
1 Point: Attempted, but unable to evaluate effectively
Scoring criteria may based upon:
Overall quality of submitted work
Demonstration of course: Concepts, Practices, and Applications
Solutions derived by you, the student, in comparison to your peers
Following instructions, adhering to requirements, level of Professionalism
Application of Instructor, Peer, and/or Professional feedback
Criteria
Evaluation criteria are defined by rubrics may vary per exercise, assignment, and project. Criteria may include:
Content: Content meets or exceeds project goals and requirements. Content improves the overall quality of the project. Criteria may include: story, mood and tone, voice, spelling, spelling and grammar, etc.
Design: Student demonstrates understanding of visual design principles, improves the user-experience, and overall Art Direction. Criteria may vary per project and include: story, mood, layout, typography, aesthetics, imagery, etc.
Production: Completed project is well constructed and functional per requirements. Project is produced with the defined tools, technologies, and processes.
Code: HTML, CSS, and/or JS is functional and without syntactical or semantic errors, code is hosted remotely, and demonstrates techniques and processes from the course with modern tooling and version control.
Presentation: The overal quality of the presentation of a project. Students have addressed the: content, the visual-design, decision-making-process, defined challenges and completed solutions.
Feedback: Throughout the design-process, the Student considers and evaluates feedback, comments, and critiques from the Instructor, their student peers, clients, and subject-matter-experts.
Last updated